What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy?
Everything you need to know
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Framework of Psychological Flexibility
Introduction: Defining the Contextual Science of Human Suffering
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a contemporary, empirically supported psychological intervention that falls under the “third wave” of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Unlike earlier iterations that focused on directly challenging or changing the content of thoughts, ACT adopts a radical approach: it views human suffering largely as a consequence of Psychological Inflexibility—the rigid dominance of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance. Developed by Steven C. Hayes, Kirk Strosahl, and Kelly G. Wilson, ACT is grounded in Relational Frame Theory (RFT), a sophisticated behavioral theory of human language and cognition. The primary goal of ACT is not the eradication of unwanted thoughts, feelings, or sensations, but rather the cultivation of Psychological Flexibility: the ability to be present, open up to what is, and move in valued directions. This shift in focus, from symptom reduction to behavior change driven by personal values, allows clients to lead richer, more meaningful lives even in the presence of inevitable psychological discomfort. ACT utilizes six core processes—often visualized as a hexagon—that systematically target and weaken the behavioral patterns that maintain suffering. By fundamentally altering the function of private experiences rather than their form, ACT encourages a life of vitality and purpose.
Time to feel better. Find a mental, physical health expert that works for you.
I. The Theoretical Foundation: Relational Frame Theory (RFT) and Psychological Inflexibility
The clinical practice of ACT is inextricably linked to its theoretical bedrock, Relational Frame Theory (RFT). Understanding RFT provides the necessary conceptual framework for appreciating ACT’s unique stance on cognition and language.
A. Relational Frame Theory (RFT): Language as the Root of Suffering
RFT is a comprehensive behavioral theory of human language that explains how humans learn to relate arbitrary events based on social conditioning, rather than direct physical properties. When a child learns the word “apple,” they learn to relate the word (the stimulus) to the fruit (the object). However, RFT explains that through this learned process, humans develop the ability to arbitrarily relate stimuli in complex ways (e.g., if A is better than B, and B is better than C, then A must be better than C). These learned Relational Frames—such as comparison, opposition, time, and hierarchy—allow for abstract thought, planning, and communication.
Paradoxically, this incredible cognitive ability is also the source of much psychological suffering. The mechanism of arbitrarily applicable relational responding (AARR) means that the brain constantly generates and tests verbal rules (e.g., “If I feel incompetent, I must withdraw”). While this rule-following behavior is highly adaptive for navigating the physical world (e.g., following a map), it becomes counterproductive when applied internally. The mind, trained as an excellent problem-solver, applies the same logic—find the problem, eliminate it—to internal private events. RFT illuminates how language structures this problem as a literal threat, leading to a pervasive, inflexible psychological stance that is inherently difficult to escape through rational argument alone. The mind relentlessly uses these frames to generate a constant stream of judgments, worries, and criticisms (e.g., “I am worse than others,” “The future will be terrible”). The central problem is Cognitive Fusion: treating the contents of one’s thoughts (products of RFT) as literal, immediate, and accurate commands or truths about reality. For instance, the thought “I am a failure” is treated not as a flexible piece of language, but as a rigid, incontrovertible fact that governs behavior. ACT interventions are specifically designed to weaken the literal functions of language (fusion) without diminishing the beneficial aspects of human cognition.
Connect Free. Improve your mental and physical health with a professional near you
B. Experiential Avoidance and the Control Agenda
When cognitive fusion convinces an individual that an internal experience (e.g., anxiety, self-doubt, sadness) is bad, dangerous, or unacceptable, the resulting coping mechanism is Experiential Avoidance. This is defined as the attempt to alter the form, frequency, or sensitivity to private events (thoughts, feelings, memories, physical sensations) even when doing so causes behavioral harm. The vast majority of dysfunctional psychological coping strategies—from substance abuse and obsessive checking to social withdrawal and procrastination—are rooted in attempts to control or eliminate unwanted internal experiences.
This sets up the Control Agenda, which is the rigid, futile psychological rule system that dictates, “In order to live a good life, I must first get rid of these unpleasant feelings.” ACT posits that this control agenda is profoundly paradoxical. When we attempt to suppress a thought or feeling, we often increase its frequency and intensity (the rebound effect). More critically, the effort spent in the avoidance struggle severely restricts life engagement. A client avoids social situations to prevent anxiety, but in doing so, sacrifices their valued life goal of connection. The struggle to control internal experience thus becomes the primary source of suffering, rather than the original symptoms themselves. The ACT model seeks to dismantle this control agenda by demonstrating its practical inefficiency and psychological cost.
This phenomenon of avoidance introduces a layer of secondary suffering, often termed “dirty pain,” which is distinct from the primary, unavoidable discomfort (“clean pain”) of life events such as loss or sadness. Clean pain is natural and transient; dirty pain is the self-inflicted psychological distress that results from the futile struggle against clean pain. The control agenda is a behavioral trap: the immediate, short-term relief offered by avoidance (e.g., distraction from worry) negatively reinforces the behavior, guaranteeing that the long-term cost—restricted values and life vitality—continues to mount. ACT aims to highlight this distinction, motivating clients to drop the struggle against their internal landscape to reallocate psychological resources toward meaningful living.
C. The Hexaflex: The Six Core Processes of Psychological Flexibility
The ACT model organizes its core therapeutic strategies into six interrelated processes, visualized as a hexagon (the Hexaflex). These processes work synergistically to increase the client’s ability to engage in adaptive, value-driven behavior.
- Acceptance: The active and deliberate choice to non-judgmentally allow unwanted private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) to occur without attempting to control or eliminate them. This is the antidote to Experiential Avoidance.
- Defusion: Learning to observe thoughts as what they are—mere words, stories, or passing mental events—rather than literal truths or rigid rules. This weakens Cognitive Fusion.
- Being Present (Contact with the Present Moment): Engaging fully and non-judgmentally with the external and internal world as it unfolds right here, right now, rather than getting caught up in ruminations about the past or worries about the future.
- Self-as-Context (The Observing Self): Shifting from viewing oneself as the content of one’s thoughts and feelings (Self-as-Content) to a flexible vantage point—the unchanging platform from which all experiences are observed. This promotes stability and non-identification with internal experiences.
- Values: Clarifying what genuinely matters to the client—their chosen life direction, desired qualities of action, and deep-seated principles. Values are never achieved (like goals), but are continuously enacted.
- Committed Action: Engaging in overt, effective behavior guided by one’s clarified values, even when internal barriers (unpleasant thoughts or feelings) are present. This is the final behavioral step that transforms flexibility into a meaningful life.
These six processes, operating collectively, define the state of Psychological Flexibility, which is the fundamental therapeutic target of ACT.
Free consultations. Connect free with local health professionals near you.
Conclusion
The comprehensive framework of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) represents a profound philosophical and practical divergence from traditional pathology-focused models. It is a contextual behavioral science that offers a powerful alternative to the widespread human tendency to engage in psychological warfare against one’s own internal experience. By grounding itself in Relational Frame Theory (RFT), ACT provides a compelling explanation for why the sophisticated architecture of human language, which allows for complex planning and communication, simultaneously entraps individuals in a relentless struggle against thoughts and feelings. The core insight is that human suffering is not primarily caused by the presence of distress, but by the struggle to avoid it. This struggle—Psychological Inflexibility—is maintained by the twin processes of Cognitive Fusion (taking thoughts literally) and Experiential Avoidance (trying to control or eliminate private events). The therapeutic journey in ACT is thus a journey of liberation from this control agenda, offering clients a pathway to vitality even when internal discomfort persists.
A. The Unifying Power of the Hexaflex: A Model of Coherence
The ACT Hexaflex serves as the central operational roadmap, illustrating how six distinct yet interconnected processes synergize to cultivate Psychological Flexibility. The six vertices can be conceptually grouped into two primary domains: the Mindfulness and Acceptance cluster (Acceptance, Defusion, Present Moment, and Self-as-Context) and the Values and Behavioral Activation cluster (Values and Committed Action). The former cluster focuses on altering the function of private events—changing the relationship an individual has with their internal world. Acceptance counters avoidance by encouraging open, non-judgmental presence, while Defusion undermines fusion, allowing thoughts to be seen as mere language rather than literal truth. Contact with the Present Moment anchors the client in the immediate, tangible reality, preventing absorption into past regret or future anxiety. Self-as-Context offers a stable viewpoint from which all these transient experiences can be observed, providing profound psychological space and non-identification with temporary emotions or thoughts.
The second cluster provides the direction and motivation for change. Clarifying deeply held Values furnishes the purpose, defining the quality of life the client chooses to pursue. Values are the compass points—they are dynamic, freely chosen directions rather than static, achievable goals. Committed Action then translates this purpose into tangible, overt behavior. This is where the rubber meets the road: acting effectively and persistently in service of one’s values, even when acceptance is difficult, and fused thoughts urge avoidance. The ultimate measure of success in ACT is not the absence of anxiety or sadness, but the increase in Value-Consistent Behavior (VCB). This unified structure ensures that therapy is not merely about feeling better (a transient goal), but about living better (a sustained life trajectory).
B. Empirical Efficacy and Transdiagnostic Utility
The clinical relevance of ACT is strongly supported by a growing body of empirical research. Initially studied for conditions like chronic pain, anxiety, and depression, ACT is now recognized as a highly effective, transdiagnostic treatment. Its principles apply across a wide spectrum of psychopathology precisely because it targets the underlying process of inflexibility rather than specific diagnostic labels. Whether a client is struggling with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, or Substance Use Disorder, the behavioral mechanism—experiential avoidance—remains a core maintaining factor.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses consistently demonstrate that ACT achieves comparable, and often superior, outcomes to traditional CBT for various conditions. For instance, in the treatment of depression, ACT’s emphasis on acceptance and committed action provides a potent counter to rumination and withdrawal. In chronic pain, shifting the goal from pain elimination to pain acceptance (as a non-modifiable reality) dramatically improves functioning and quality of life. Furthermore, ACT’s effectiveness has been demonstrated in non-clinical settings, including organizational leadership, burnout prevention, and performance enhancement, solidifying its status as a robust contextual intervention applicable to general human distress. The strength of this evidence base firmly establishes ACT within the echelon of evidence-based psychological practice, moving it beyond the conceptual realm into proven clinical utility.
C. ACT’s Enduring Legacy and Future Trajectory
ACT’s most significant enduring legacy is its role in pioneering and defining the “third wave” of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. This wave is characterized by an emphasis on context, acceptance, mindfulness, and the therapeutic relationship, marking a crucial evolution in behavioral science. ACT and its underlying RFT framework have provided a rigorous, functional-analytic tool for understanding and intervening upon complex human verbal behavior.
Looking forward, the future trajectory of ACT involves two primary areas of growth. First, there is increasing integration with other contextual behavioral science (CBS) models, creating unified treatment protocols that leverage the strengths of various third-wave approaches. Second, the development of technology-assisted ACT (TechACT), including mobile applications, digital coaching, and virtual reality components, is rapidly expanding its accessibility and scalability. These technological adaptations make the processes of defusion and present moment awareness readily accessible outside the therapist’s office, promoting continuous, real-time application of Psychological Flexibility in daily life.
In conclusion, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a profound pathway to human vitality. It challenges the deeply ingrained notion that happiness is found by eliminating what is painful, asserting instead that a rich and meaningful life is defined by one’s commitment to cherished values, even as one holds the unavoidable discomfort of human existence. ACT shifts the existential equation: suffering is inevitable, but distress can be optional. By equipping individuals with the six flexible competencies of the Hexaflex, ACT provides the structural and philosophical means for navigating life’s complexity with open-hearted presence, transforming struggle into purpose, and ultimately guiding the client toward a life truly worth living.
Time to feel better. Find a mental, physical health expert that works for you.
Common FAQs
This FAQ addresses common questions and clarifies the key theoretical principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), as discussed in the main article.
What exactly is the goal of ACT? Is it just about 'accepting' everything?
The goal of ACT is not passive acceptance of everything bad that happens. The goal is to achieve Psychological Flexibility. This means:
- Being Present: Engaging fully with the current moment, regardless of whether internal experiences are pleasant or unpleasant.
- Opening Up: Making space for difficult thoughts, feelings, and sensations (Acceptance) rather than fighting them.
- Doing What Matters: Taking meaningful action guided by your Values (Committed Action).
The core shift is from trying to feel better to trying to live better. Acceptance is the tool you use to free up the energy currently spent on struggling, so you can redirect it toward a life you genuinely value.
How does ACT differ from traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)?
Traditional CBT often focuses on directly challenging, disputing, and changing the content of negative thoughts (e.g., proving the thought “I am a failure” is untrue).
ACT is different because it focuses on changing the function of the thought:
- CBT’s focus:What is the thought, and is it accurate?
- ACT’s focus:What is my relationship to this thought, and how is it affecting my behavior?
ACT uses techniques like Defusion to help you notice that a thought is just a collection of words, not an absolute truth or a command you must follow. You don’t argue with the thought; you simply choose to let it be there while you do something meaningful.
What is Cognitive Fusion, and why is it problematic?
Cognitive Fusion is the state of being entangled with your thoughts, treating them as literal, immediate truths or rigid rules.
Example of Fusion: When you have the thought, “I am incompetent,” you fuse with it, and your behavior follows the thought as if it were a literal fact. You might stop applying for jobs or withdraw from challenging tasks.
Why it’s problematic: If you are fused with negative, self-limiting thoughts, those thoughts will dictate your actions, leading to Psychological Inflexibility and preventing you from pursuing your values.
What is Experiential Avoidance, and how does it relate to suffering?
Experiential Avoidance is the attempt to control, suppress, distract from, or eliminate any unwanted private experience (thoughts, emotions, memories, or physical sensations) even when those attempts cause behavioral harm.
Examples of Avoidance: Drinking alcohol to numb anxiety, ruminating endlessly to “solve” worry, procrastinating to avoid feelings of inadequacy, or excessive checking to suppress the thought of a mistake.
ACT argues that Experiential Avoidance is the primary cause of chronic psychological suffering. While it provides short-term relief, the long-term cost is a restricted, less vital life, as the energy spent avoiding is energy stolen from living. The struggle against internal experience (the Control Agenda) is more painful than the experience itself.
What is the Hexaflex, and how do the six processes work together?
The Hexaflex is the visual model representing the six core therapeutic processes that make up ACT. These processes are not linear steps but interconnected skills that lead to Psychological Flexibility:
- Acceptance & Defusion: Learning to open up to and untangle from internal experiences.
- Contact with the Present Moment & Self-as-Context: Developing mindful awareness and a stable sense of self (The Observing Self) from which to watch experiences unfold.
- Values & Committed Action: Defining a meaningful direction in life and taking concrete steps toward it.
These six processes are designed to work synergistically. For example, Defusion and Acceptance provide the space, Values provide the direction, and Committed Action provides the movement.
What does ACT mean by "Values"? Are they the same as goals?
Values are fundamentally different from goals:
|
Feature |
Values (ACT) |
Goals |
|
Nature |
A chosen, desired quality of action and life direction. |
A specific outcome or result that can be achieved or completed. |
|
Achievability |
Never achieved; they are continuous (e.g., being a loving parent). |
Can be completed and checked off (e.g., taking a child to the park). |
|
Example |
To live with integrity, to be courageous, to be present with my partner. |
Get a promotion, run a marathon, lose 10 pounds. |
Values provide the why for your behavior. ACT emphasizes clarifying your values so that your committed actions are purposeful, even if they are difficult.
What is Relational Frame Theory (RFT) and why is it important to ACT?
RFT is the scientific theory of human language and cognition that underpins ACT. It explains how language creates human suffering.
RFT explains that the human mind creates arbitrary connections between stimuli (Relational Frames) (e.g., relating the word “danger” to the feeling of anxiety). This allows us to think abstractly but also causes our minds to apply problem-solving rules (find it, fix it) to our feelings.
People also ask
Q:What is acceptance and commitment therapy?
Q:What are the 6 principles of acceptance and commitment therapy?
Q: Which is better, CBT or ACT?
Q:What are the 4 A's of acceptance and commitment therapy?
NOTICE TO USERS
MindBodyToday is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Always seek the advice of your physician or qualified mental health provider with any questions you may have regarding any mental health symptom or medical condition. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on MindBodyToday.
Share this article
Let us know about your needs
Quickly reach the right healthcare Pro
Message health care pros and get the help you need.
Popular Healthcare Professionals Near You
You might also like
What is Family Systems Therapy: A…
, What is Family Systems Therapy? Everything you need to know Find a Pro Family Systems Therapy: Understanding the Individual […]
What is Synthesis of Acceptance and…
, What is Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)? Everything you need to know Find a Pro Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): Synthesizing […]
What is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)…
, What is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ? Everything you need to know Find a Pro Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Theoretical Foundations, […]
