What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy?
Everything you need to know
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Cultivating Psychological Flexibility Through Values-Driven Action
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), pronounced as a single word “act,” is a potent, empirically supported form of cognitive-behavioral therapy that represents the “third wave” of behavioral science. Developed by Steven C. Hayes, Kirk Strosahl, and Kelly G. Wilson in the late 1980s, ACT fundamentally shifts the therapeutic goal away from symptom reduction or control of distressing private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) toward the development of psychological flexibility. ACT posits that human suffering is often amplified by the very processes we use to try and control our internal experiences, a phenomenon referred to as Experiential Avoidance. The theory is grounded in Relational Frame Theory (RFT), a sophisticated behavioral theory of human language and cognition, which explains how our language system creates complex psychological rules that often lead us to fusion with unhelpful thoughts. The core of ACT is a transdiagnostic model aimed at increasing the individual’s ability to be fully present with whatever internal experiences arise, while simultaneously moving toward a life aligned with deeply held personal values. The therapeutic model is captured by the Hexaflex, a framework of six interconnected core processes: Acceptance, Defusion, Present Moment Awareness, Self-as-Context, Values, and Committed Action. The central paradox of ACT is that by accepting what cannot be controlled (internal experience), one gains the leverage to meaningfully change what can be controlled (behavior).
This comprehensive article will explore the historical context of ACT within the evolution of behavioral science, detail the foundational role of Relational Frame Theory (RFT) in understanding cognitive fusion, and systematically analyze the six core processes of the Hexaflex as interconnected pathways to psychological flexibility. Understanding these concepts is paramount for appreciating ACT’s depth as a values-driven, context-focused psychological intervention.
Time to feel better. Find a mental, physical health expert that works for you.
- Historical Context and Theoretical Foundations
ACT emerged from a dissatisfaction with traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy’s (CBT) over-reliance on the direct modification of thought content and its often-unsuccessful attempts to eliminate unwanted internal experience. It represents a significant evolution in the application of behavioral principles.
- The Third Wave of Behavioral Science
ACT is a defining intervention of the “third wave” of behavioral and cognitive therapies, following the first wave (Classical and Operant Conditioning) and the second wave (Cognitive Therapy and CBT).
- Focus Shift: The third wave maintains the empirical rigor of behaviorism but shifts the therapeutic focus from changing the content of thoughts (e.g., arguing against a negative belief) to changing the function and context of psychological events. ACT is thus a contextual behavioral science, emphasizing that the work is not about fixing the individual, but about understanding the historical and environmental factors that give rise to behavior and emotional suffering.
- Critique of Symptom Reduction: ACT fundamentally challenged the traditional goal of symptom elimination. It argues that the relentless pursuit of feeling “good” or “normal” often results in the paradoxical increase of suffering, particularly when relying on suppression or avoidance techniques. The therapeutic goal is therefore redefined as living well and meaningfully, independent of the presence of difficult private experiences.
- Relational Frame Theory (RFT)
RFT is the basic behavioral science that underpins ACT, offering a sophisticated explanation for how human language and cognition create the very psychological problems ACT seeks to resolve.
- Derived Relational Responding: RFT posits that humans learn to relate arbitrary events (such as words, symbols, and concepts) not just based on direct, explicit learning, but based on socially agreed-upon rules and relationships. This is derived relational responding. For example, a child learns that if “sadness” is related to “bad” and “bad” is related to “failure,” then sadness is implicitly related to failure, even without ever being taught that direct link.
- The Fusion Problem: This derived relational responding allows us to “fuse” with our thoughts. A thought like “I am worthless” is treated not as a fleeting internal verbal event, but as an equivalent, literal, and concrete external fact about the self, just like “My name is John.” This cognitive fusion is what lends thoughts their power to dominate behavior and emotional experience. The therapist uses RFT principles to help the client break down these rigid verbal rules.
- The Core Theory of Suffering
ACT’s model of psychopathology centers on the interplay between the language-driven problem of cognitive fusion and the resulting behavioral strategy of experiential avoidance.
- Experiential Avoidance (EA)
EA is the key construct in ACT’s model of human suffering, referring to the attempt to alter the form, frequency, or intensity of private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) even when doing so is ultimately harmful or costly.
- The Problem of Control: ACT argues that our human cultural context teaches us a faulty premise: if we don’t like something, we should control or eliminate it. While this strategy works effectively for external objects (closing a door, turning off a light), it fails catastrophically for internal states. The effort to suppress a thought or feeling often leads to a rebound effect, making the unwanted experience more dominant, intense, and frequent.
- The Costs of Avoidance: Experiential avoidance encompasses overt behaviors (e.g., substance abuse, self-harm, social withdrawal) and subtle behaviors (e.g., excessive rumination, procrastination, intellectualization) all aimed at reducing immediate distress. The critical cost of EA is a progressive restriction of life and vitality, as the individual’s focus shifts from pursuing their values to constantly prioritizing feeling “better.” This creates a vicious cycle of suffering.
- Cognitive Fusion
Fusion is the process by which thoughts and verbal rules dominate and dictate behavior because we treat them as literal truth, objective facts, immutable commands, or impending danger.
- Fusion and Rigid Rules: Language creates rigid behavioral rules, often in the form of warnings or imperatives (e.g., “If I feel anxious, I must leave the room immediately” or “I can’t start a new career until I stop doubting myself”). Fusion means the individual acts on these rules instantly and automatically, rather than observing them as passing mental events to be evaluated for their helpfulness.
- Unworkability: To initiate change, ACT asks clients to rigorously assess the “workability” of their strategies for control and avoidance. The central therapeutic question is: “Is what you are doing working to move you toward a rich, full, and meaningful life?” The inevitable answer of “no” opens the door for new behavioral choices based on acceptance and values, rather than avoidance.
Connect Free. Improve your mental and physical health with a professional near you
III. The Six Core Processes (The Hexaflex)
The six core processes of ACT are typically grouped into two main, interconnected pillars—Mindfulness and Acceptance processes and Commitment and Behavior Change processes—all working synergistically to increase psychological flexibility.
- Mindfulness and Acceptance Processes (Opening Up)
These four processes aim to change the relationship the client has with their thoughts and emotions.
- Acceptance: The active process of making space for and allowing private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) to exist in the present moment without struggling against them or trying to change them. This is the opposite of experiential avoidance.
- Defusion: The technique of separating oneself from one’s thoughts. Learning to notice thoughts as mere language, sounds, or strings of words (“I am having the thought that…”) rather than literal truths or facts about the world.
- Present Moment Awareness: The practice of bringing flexible, open, and voluntary attention to the physical and psychological experiences occurring in the here-and-now, rather than being stuck dwelling in the past or worrying excessively about the future.
- Self-as-Context (The Observing Self): Accessing a detached, consistent, and stable perspective from which one can observe one’s ever-changing thoughts, feelings, and sensations without being identified with or defined by them. This perspective is stable, like the stage upon which the performance of life takes place.
- Commitment and Behavior Change Processes (Moving Forward)
These two processes provide the direction and sustained action for a life of meaning.
- Values: The process of clarifying what truly matters to the client—their chosen, deeply held directions in life (e.g., being a loving partner, a dedicated professional, a generous friend). Values are ongoing, chosen qualities of action, not goals that can be achieved and checked off.
- Committed Action: Taking large and small, effective steps consistent with one’s chosen values. This involves building behavioral patterns and habits that serve the client’s valued direction, critically, even in the presence of difficult thoughts and feelings.
Free consultations. Connect free with local health professionals near you.
Conclusion
ACT—The Synthesis of Mindfulness, Acceptance, and Values
The detailed examination of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) confirms its status as a revolutionary, empirically-supported “third wave” behavioral intervention. ACT challenges the traditional paradigm of symptom control, asserting that human suffering is primarily fueled by Experiential Avoidance—the counterproductive struggle against unwanted internal private experiences. Grounded in Relational Frame Theory (RFT), ACT explains how language leads to cognitive fusion, causing thoughts to dictate behavior, often resulting in a life constrained by anxiety and avoidance. The therapeutic power of ACT is encapsulated in the Hexaflex, a model of six interwoven core processes designed to cultivate psychological flexibility. This flexibility—the ability to be fully present and choose behaviors aligned with one’s values—is the ultimate marker of mental health in this model. This conclusion will synthesize the central paradox of ACT, detail the functional analysis of behavior that drives intervention, and affirm the profound implications of ACT as a transdiagnostic approach focused on rich, meaningful living rather than mere symptom elimination.
- The Central Paradox and Functional Analysis
The clinical success of ACT is driven by its ability to engage the client in the central paradox of change: fighting leads to suffering, and acceptance leads to the possibility of change.
- The Central Paradox of Acceptance
ACT introduces the radical idea that genuine change often requires first ceasing the attempt to change the difficult internal experience.
- Creative Hopelessness: The therapeutic process begins with Creative Hopelessness, a stage where the therapist helps the client rigorously examine the workability of their past and current control strategies (Experiential Avoidance). The goal is to facilitate the client’s genuine realization that the strategies they use to reduce suffering (e.g., avoidance, suppression, distraction) are the very behaviors that have increased their long-term suffering and constrained their life.
- Acceptance as an Alternative: Once the client realizes that fighting is “unworkable,” the alternative—Acceptance—becomes possible. Acceptance is defined as the active, willing, and non-judgmental embrace of one’s current internal experiences. It is not passive resignation, but an active choice to drop the futile struggle with the internal world. The paradox is that when the client ceases the struggle to avoid the feeling, the feeling often loses its dominance and tyrannical power over their behavior.
- Functional Contextualism and Behavioral Analysis
ACT adheres to Functional Contextualism, analyzing behaviors based on their function (what the behavior achieves) within the context of the client’s life, rather than their form (what the behavior looks like).
- The Functional Question: Instead of asking, “Why do you feel anxious?” (a structural, cognitive question), the ACT therapist asks, “What is the function of the anxiety in your life, and what is the function of your behavior in response to the anxiety?” (a functional, contextual question).
- Identifying the Function of Avoidance: For example, procrastination may look like laziness (form), but its function may be to avoid the anxiety associated with potential failure (Experiential Avoidance). By clarifying this function, the therapist can help the client choose a different, values-driven action to achieve a different long-term outcome.
- The Choice Point: This analysis leads to the Choice Point, where the client identifies the juncture where their values-driven actions and their avoidance behaviors diverge, allowing them to make a conscious choice based on their desired future.
- Integrating Mindfulness and Values into Action
The six processes of the Hexaflex work in concert, synthesizing the “opening up” (Mindfulness/Acceptance) skills with the “moving forward” (Values/Commitment) skills to create lasting change.
- Defusion and Self-as-Context as Decoupling
The mindfulness-based processes of Defusion and Self-as-Context are essential for decoupling the client from the literal content of their thoughts.
- Defusion Techniques: Techniques like repeating a thought quickly until it loses meaning, or saying “I’m having the thought that…” before a negative thought, transform the thought from a literal command into a simple verbal event. This neutralizes the thought’s power to drive automatic avoidance behaviors.
- The Observing Self: Accessing the Self-as-Context (the Observing Self) provides the stable, non-judgmental space from which Defusion can occur. This self is constant and unchangeable, unlike the content of one’s thoughts and feelings. This awareness allows the client to say, “I am not my anxiety; I am the observer of my anxiety.”
- Values and Committed Action
The final two processes provide the necessary motivational and directional structure for behavioral change.
- Values Clarification: ACT values are not moral mandates or desired feelings, but freely chosen, ongoing qualities of action that the client deems important (e.g., “to be a present parent,” “to be a courageous professional”). Values act as a compass, providing direction even when the path is uncomfortable.
- Committed Action: This is the behavioral component, which involves setting goals based on values. Unlike traditional behavioral assignments aimed at reducing anxiety, ACT assignments focus on moving toward a valued life, with the explicit understanding that the anxiety (or other unwanted internal experience) will likely come along for the ride. For example, a client commits to applying for a new job (Committed Action), despite the accompanying feelings of worthlessness and fear (Acceptance).
- Conclusion: ACT as a Transdiagnostic Model
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a flexible, principle-driven approach that is fundamentally transdiagnostic, meaning its core processes apply effectively across a broad range of clinical presentations, from anxiety and depression to chronic pain and psychosis. Its focus on the functional unworkability of Experiential Avoidance and its reliance on the power of language (RFT) provide a unified understanding of human psychological suffering.
By teaching clients to shift their relationship with their inner world through Mindfulness and Acceptance, and to shift their external behavior through Values and Committed Action, ACT achieves its goal: cultivating psychological flexibility. This flexibility empowers the client to move beyond the limitations imposed by their distressing thoughts and emotions, leading not merely to symptom management, but to the creation of a life that is rich, full, and meaningful, even amidst the inevitable difficulties of human existence.
Time to feel better. Find a mental, physical health expert that works for you.
Common FAQs
What is the main goal of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)?
The main goal is to achieve psychological flexibility: the ability to be fully present and choose behaviors aligned with deeply held personal values, even in the presence of difficult thoughts and feelings. The goal is not symptom reduction.
What is Experiential Avoidance (EA), and why is it a problem?
EA is the counterproductive attempt to alter, suppress, or control the form, frequency, or intensity of private internal experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations). ACT views EA as the primary driver of chronic human suffering because the struggle to control the inner world makes problems worse (the rebound effect).
What is the Central Paradox of ACT?
The paradox is that by accepting what you cannot control (your internal experience), you gain the leverage to meaningfully change what you can control (your behavior, consistent with your values).
What is the significance of the term "unworkability"?
ACT asks clients to assess whether their past strategies (especially avoidance) are “working” to move them toward a rich, full, and meaningful life. If the strategy is unworkable, it provides the motivation for change (Creative Hopelessness).
Common FAQs
The Hexaflex and Core Processes
What are the two main pillars of the Hexaflex model?
- Mindfulness and Acceptance processes (aimed at Opening Up to internal experience).
- Commitment and Behavior Change processes (aimed at Moving Forward with action).
Define Cognitive Fusion and Defusion.
Cognitive Fusion is when we treat a thought as a literal truth, an immutable fact, or a dominant command (e.g., “I am a failure”). Defusion is the technique of separating from the thought, viewing it as just a verbal event (e.g., “I am having the thought that I am a failure”).
What is Acceptance in ACT?
Acceptance is the active, deliberate, and non-judgmental willingness to make space for and allow private experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) to exist without fighting them or trying to push them away.
What is Self-as-Context (The Observing Self)?
It is accessing a detached, stable perspective from which one can observe one’s ever-changing thoughts, feelings, and sensations without being defined by them. It’s the stage upon which the internal experiences (the performance) occur.
How are Values different from Goals?
Values are freely chosen, ongoing qualities of action or chosen life directions (e.g., being a kind partner; living courageously). Goals are specific, achievable outcomes that can be completed (e.g., getting a degree; finishing a report) that are set in service of a value.
What is Committed Action?
Taking large and small, effective steps that are consistent with one’s chosen values, often with the explicit understanding that the accompanying difficult thoughts and feelings will be present.
Common FAQs
Theory and Application
What is Relational Frame Theory (RFT)?
RFT is the basic behavioral science underlying ACT. It explains how human language and derived relational responding create complex verbal rules that lead to cognitive fusion and the resulting psychological suffering.
Why is ACT considered a transdiagnostic approach?
Because it focuses on the universal human process of Experiential Avoidance and its underlying mechanisms (RFT) rather than targeting specific diagnostic labels (like anxiety or depression). Its core processes are applicable across a wide range of clinical presentations.
What is the Choice Point?
A therapeutic tool that helps the client identify the junctures where their values-driven actions diverge from their avoidance behaviors, allowing them to make a conscious choice aligned with their desired life direction.
People also ask
Q: What are the 6 principles of acceptance and commitment therapy?
Q:What are the 4 A's of acceptance and commitment therapy?
Q: What is the difference between ACT and CBT?
Q:What are the techniques of ACT?
NOTICE TO USERS
MindBodyToday is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Always seek the advice of your physician or qualified mental health provider with any questions you may have regarding any mental health symptom or medical condition. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on MindBodyToday.
Share this article
Let us know about your needs
Quickly reach the right healthcare Pro
Message health care pros and get the help you need.
Popular Healthcare Professionals Near You
You might also like
What is Family Systems Therapy: A…
, What is Family Systems Therapy?Everything you need to know Find a Pro Family Systems Therapy: Understanding the Individual within […]
What is Synthesis of Acceptance and…
, What is Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)? Everything you need to know Find a Pro Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): Synthesizing […]
What is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)…
, What is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ? Everything you need to know Find a Pro Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Theoretical Foundations, […]